Threat Intelligence

An Employment Verification Request That Passed DMARC REJECT, Then Sent Replies to Someone Else

Written by Audian Paxson | Jun 14, 2026 11:00:00 AM
TL;DR Attackers sent an employment verification request impersonating InformData, a legitimate background check company, through SendGrid infrastructure. The email passed SPF, DKIM, and DMARC with a REJECT enforcement policy, the strictest available. The Reply-To header pointed to support@verifying[.]you, and the CTA linked to verify.zippedscript[.]com, both attacker-controlled domains. The employment verification pretext exploits the urgency recipients feel around hiring processes. A colleague at the target organization reported the email, and one mailbox was quarantined.
Severity: High Credential Harvesting Social Engineering MITRE: {'id': 'T1566.002', 'name': 'Phishing: Spearphishing Link'} MITRE: {'id': 'T1036.005', 'name': 'Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location'} MITRE: {'id': 'T1598.003', 'name': 'Phishing for Information: Spearphishing Link'}

The email said "Employment Verification Request." The sender was verifications@international.informdata[.]com, a domain belonging to a real background check company. SPF passed. DKIM passed. DMARC passed, with the strictest possible enforcement policy: p=REJECT sp=REJECT. Every authentication signal said this message was legitimate.

It was not. The Reply-To pointed to support@verifying[.]you. The "Review Employment" button linked to verify.zippedscript[.]com. Both were attacker-controlled domains with no connection to InformData.

In June 2026, IRONSCALES flagged this phishing attack targeting an employee at a sports data technology company. A colleague at the same organization reported the email, and one mailbox was quarantined.

Why DMARC REJECT Did Not Help

DMARC at p=REJECT is the gold standard for email authentication enforcement. It instructs receiving mail servers to reject any message that fails alignment checks. In this case, the attacker sent through SendGrid (wfbtrqkw.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net, IP 159[.]183[.]84[.]25), which was configured as an authorized sender for international.informdata[.]com. The DKIM signature used selector s1 under that domain. The Return-Path pointed to a VERP-encoded address at em8327.international.informdata[.]com, a SendGrid subdomain.

Everything aligned. DMARC did exactly what it was designed to do: it verified that the sending infrastructure was authorized for the domain. The problem is that authorization and intent are not the same thing. The attacker either compromised the InformData SendGrid account or configured a new SendGrid identity that could sign for the domain.

The Employment Verification Pretext

Employment verification requests are routine in business operations. Background check companies like InformData send them regularly, and recipients expect to receive them during hiring cycles. The pretext works because ignoring or delaying a verification can slow a colleague's onboarding, creating professional pressure to act quickly.

The CTA linked to verify.zippedscript[.]com/verify/employment/51d4ba99721cdbdbe83cc09a15f3d76b. The long hash in the URL path is a per-recipient tracking token, allowing the attacker to correlate clicks with specific email addresses. WHOIS for zippedscript[.]com shows Cloudflare nameservers and privacy-protected registration, a disposable domain with no legitimate web presence.

The unsubscribe link also pointed to verify.zippedscript[.]com/unsubscribe, confirming that the attacker controlled the entire link infrastructure.

Detection

This was a first-time sender flagged as high risk. Themis, the IRONSCALES Adaptive AI, labeled the recipient as a VIP and flagged the message based on behavioral signals: the Reply-To domain mismatch, the first-time sender pattern, and the disconnect between the legitimate brand identity and the link destinations. The detection did not depend on authentication failure, because there was none.

Defenders reviewing employment verification emails should check whether the Reply-To domain matches the From domain and whether CTA links resolve to the sender's actual infrastructure. When a background check company's email routes replies and clicks to entirely different domains, the verification request is the attack.

See Your Risk: Calculate how many threats your SEG is missing

Indicators of Compromise

TypeIndicatorContext
Sender Emailverifications@international.informdata[.]comImpersonated real background check company
Reply-To Emailsupport@verifying[.]youAttacker-controlled reply diversion
Credential Harvesting Domainverify.zippedscript[.]comHosted verification phishing page
Credential Harvesting URLverify.zippedscript[.]com/verify/employment/51d4ba99721cdbdbe83cc09a15f3d76bPer-recipient tracking token in path
Alternate Link Domainverifying[.]youSecondary attacker domain (same path structure)
Unsubscribe URLverify.zippedscript[.]com/unsubscribeAttacker-controlled unsubscribe endpoint
Sending IP159[.]183[.]84[.]25SendGrid outbound infrastructure
Sending Hostnamewfbtrqkw.outbound-mail.sendgrid.netSendGrid relay server
DKIM Selectors1 (d=international.informdata[.]com)DKIM signing domain
Return-Path Domainem8327.international.informdata[.]comSendGrid VERP subdomain

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

TechniqueIDRelevance
Phishing: Spearphishing LinkT1566.002Employment verification email with credential harvesting link
Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or LocationT1036.005Impersonation of real background check company (InformData)
Phishing for Information: Spearphishing LinkT1598.003Per-recipient tracking tokens for target validation
Email Attack of the Day is a daily series from IRONSCALES spotlighting real phishing attacks caught by Adaptive AI and our community of 35,000+ security professionals. Each post breaks down a real attack. What it looked like, why it worked, and what to do about it.

Related attacks

Attack What happened
The Webinar Invite That Came With an Apple Wallet Pass and a Three-Hop Redirect ChainA Google Calendar invite for a fake AI webinar passed full authentication and carried an .ics file, an Apple Wallet .pkpass.
The Bank Statement You Had to Unlock With Your Birthday: PII-Gated PDF Evasion From Authenticated InfrastructureA fully authenticated email from banking infrastructure delivered a password-protected PDF that required the recipient's mobile number and date of birth...
The Subdomain That Fused Two Trusted Brands Into One Convincing LieAttackers fused two real brand names into a single subdomain, routed the message through Zix infrastructure to inherit enterprise authentication.
Stripe Sent This Email. The Authentication Was Perfect. The Payment Button Was Not.A phishing email arrived from Stripe's own infrastructure with perfect SPF, DKIM, and DMARC alignment.
The .Gov Email That Passed Every Check and Stored Its Payload on Azure Government CloudA W-9 request from a county government office passed SPF, DKIM, and DMARC with a perfect compauth score.